Thursday, March 28, 2013

AIDS, Wits, and Thailand’s Condom King



Above is a short film called "A Reason to Smile" from Scenarios from Africa

A script-writing contest. A short film directed by Africa’s best. A breath of fresh air as to how HIV-positive individuals are stereotyped. These are the things that amazed me about Scenarios in Africa’s work. Discussed by Dr. Kate Winskell, this section was Week 3’s highlight for me. The creativity by which Scenarios addressed the HIV and AIDS through education inspired me to look through the other creative ways that the disease is being dealt with. It is fortunate that, in my years of advocating for reproductive and sexual health in my country, I have had the pleasure of meeting Thailand’s Condom King, Mechai Viravaidya. I am not Thai – I am Filipino – but I admire Khun Mechai’s humor and his no-nonsense, out of the box approach to bringing down HIV and AIDS.

In the late 1980s, the number of HIV positive individuals soared to spic proportions in Thailand. In fact, in 1991, there were roughly 140,000 cases per year in the country.[i] Over a twelve-year period, however, these numbers plunged by an amazing 90%. World Bank estimated 7.7 million lives saved from the infection.[ii]

How was this done?

Like Scenarios, Thailand also tapped public awareness and education as its primary means of slowing the spread of HIV. The awareness campaign was headed by Mechai Viravaidya, who zeroed in on the problem: spreading the word about HIV and AIDS and providing basic services that would ensure protection against the disease in the fastest possible manner. To address this, Khun Mechai and his group tapped media and laymen. A compulsory 30-second infomercial was aired in television for every hour of broadcast and several TV and movie personalities were made advocates of HIV prevention. Information on the infection and its transmission can be found on calendars and other easily-seen materials. The military and the politicians were educated on the HIV and AIDS. Condoms were made available everywhere: in buses, shops, in taxis, in bars. HIV and AIDS education was launched in businesses and establishments, and it did not stop there. Schools would have AIDS Awareness Day, an event funded by businesses. Condom-blowing contests were a regular activity. University students were taught about the infection. They, in turn, helped secondary students learn about the disease. These secondary students passed the knowledge to primary school student. These kids would then go home and educate their parents and siblings about HIV and AIDS, often bringing with them complimentary condoms just in case one was needed. Khun Mechai himself penetrated Thailand’s red light district, often accompanied by someone wearing a multi-colored condom dress, to give out rubber to commercial sex workers as well as their patrons.
Photo by Yuri Baral. At Mulat Pinoy's Beyond Condoms talk with Mechai Viravaidya and
other RH advocates of the youth.


Condoms or, as Khun Mechai calls them, weapons of mass protection, became part of everyday life and were no longer sexualized.  Many conservative societies demonize the use of the rubber to protect against disease, saying that promotion of such is also promotion of sexual promiscuity. This is one of the reasons why, as Dr. James Curran said, “people are having sex in a sea of virologic ignorance.” Khun Mechai went against these beliefs and made condoms an everyday object. Those who campaigned with him for safe sex wore dresses made of condoms. The rubber was used keep cellphones and other gadgets waterproof. He once demonstrated how it can be used to tie one’s hair back. These actions shook whatever shame the Thais have in acquiring the protective device.iii, iv

Mechai Viravaidya found a highly effective formula in stopping HIV on its tracks: tapping the grassroot level to educate one another, and making condom not just accessible, but also acceptable[iii] [iv]

“When money talks, people listen”

This is something that Khun Mechai said, when I met him in 2011, during a talk held in.[v] The belief in the power of business in uplifting people from poverty and from a degraded self esteem – things that People Living with HIV (PLHIV) often go through. This was what sparked the Positive Partnership Program.
In this program, a PLHIV partners with an HIV negative and they are given a loan to start a business. Not only does the business provide the PLHIV a source of income for medical needs such as anti-retroviral drugs, but it also allows the person to be re-integrated to society. Most PLHIV feel alienated due to their positive status. Positive Partnership empowers PLHIV by making them entrepreneurs – functioning members of society. The project was so successful that within 3 years from implementation, 91% of the loan had been paid off. iv,[vi]

The Positive Partnership Program hits two birds with one stone: PLHIV become financially independent and assert themselves as contributors to their community.

Radical approach

These methods were as aggressive as they are radical – and they worked. It did not take a miracle, but it did require that people change their behaviors and outlook about safe sex, conservative society or otherwise.
As of today, I have yet to see such revolutionary approach to dealing with HIV and AIDS in the Philippines, my country, where AIDS cases are growing steadily. I hope one day we would. This innovative method, just like Scenarios of Africa, which is aimed at behavioral change through creative information dissemination, should be taken into consideration by those who wish to bring down HIV and AIDS.


Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Dibuho 2013: Roles of Modern Nurses and the Gapuz Exchange

Hey Readers!

I'm finally launching the Dibuho Project! This means give-aways, reader's participation, and bragging rights to come! 

What got me going was this little exchange with Mr. Ray Gapuz, owner of the oh-so-famous R.A. Gapuz Review Center. Here are a couple of screen shots:






I will say two things: (1) I studied at that review center and I believe we were taught that comprehension is essential to passing the Nursing board exam and (2) I passed the Nursing board exam, so if I lacked comprehension, it must mean that I got my license out of pure luck. Woah.

This exchange got me thinking on the role of the nurse in the modern times, and since I'd really love to know what people think, I decided it would be good to make this topic Codswallop's first dibuho. 

I'm going to be giving away a bunch of stuff, including a free BLS or Heartsaver training, 50% off ACLS training, and 35% off EMT-B training, all from our good buddies at HealthCare Advantage Training Institute. For those who'd love to have the BLS and ACLS, then you'd be much happier to know that these courses are American Heart Association certified. Talk about going international. Also, the EMT-B program is a licensure training which is TESDA accredited. I've seen the HCAI facility, questioned their people with my usual mataray-eyebrows, and am satisfied enough to say that their training is well worth your time (I fell in love with the simulation-ambulance!). Interested parties can check them out here.

All that gift cards and freebies plus this amazing piece of literature by Bob Ong are yours by just giving me insights on what you think the role of the nurse will be. Pretty good deal, if you think about it. 


Here's how to win. It's as easy as pie:

2. PM Codswallop your name, contact details, and answer to the question below.
3. Post your answer in the comment section of this blogpost as well.
4. My fave answer will get freebies galore, and I'll get in touch with the guy or the gal with the most awesome response for the prices.


Ready, reader? Express your dibuho now!

Love from,

Janina ^_^

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Words of Wisdom for that Emotion those Traitorous Bitches, your Hormones and Nerve Impulses, Create (Plus Safe Sex Reminders)

So: I am writing while Alex Goot is singing/being amazing in the background. Who's Alex? Well, he's this pretty cool Youtube musician.  He's so good he makes Justin Bieber songs sound good. Check out the vid below. He's the guy with the glasses, and yes, he's the one fisting the piano.  




You understand why I'm crushing on this guy, right? 

This post would have been better if I came up with during Valentines season instead of during the dying days of March. Yes, ladies and gents, friends and neighbors, I've gone completely cuckoo and I am writing about love today. This is for all my friends who, for some reason, seek me out to talk about their love lives (or lack of love lives), their bleeding hearts, and their sex lives (usually regarding birth control). Welcome to Words of Wisdom for that Emotion that Traitorous Bitches, your Hormones and Nervous Impulses, Create (Plus Safe Sex Reminders), a Q and A where I play love guru and hopefully not screw up people's lives.



WARNING! Cusses, sexual innuendos, etc. Don't read if you don't like. 

DISCLAIMER: I actually SUCK at giving love advice. I can totally handle birth control counseling though ^_~


Let's start, shall we?




Q:  What do you mean hormones and nerve impulses? Do we not love with our hearts?


Stop blaming the heart. It's not its fault you're head over heels with that
one person you can' t just get with. 
A: No dude. No. Your heart beats and supplies blood to your body, keeping you oxygenated and alive. It's made of of ventricles and atria and cardiac muscles. It does not "feel". Blame the brain, friends and neighbors. That's the real culprit. Love is an emotion brought about by a cocktail of hormones (which gives you the same high as a bunch of illegal drugs, actually).

Oh, here's a trivia: sucking  your partner's nipple produces a hormone called oxytocin, which creates bonding, just like in babies and their moms. 


Q: My boyfriend/girlfriend is an arse. But I am hopelessly in love with him. What do I do?

A: Take it from someone who's been in a suicidally shitty relationships and whose self esteem has been pretty much in the dumps: turn around and walk away. You'll survive. You'll cry for a few days, feel shittier for a few weeks then one day you'll wake up and laugh and ask yourself what the hell you were thinking. Trust me.



Q: (Buddy Question) Why do some men choose mistresses over their wives (or the other way around, for that matter)?


A:Tough question. Several reasons, really. It may just be because the person you cheat with is shiny and new and mysterious and interesting. It may be because love has gone out the window, or at least has trickled out because of a thousand possible reasons. It could be that the person you're married to isn't the one you're meant to be with. Someone told me once that if you and your partner have different ideologies, different dreams and priorities, then things would probably not work out. 

Makes sense to me.

Q: How would you differentiate making love and fucking?

A: Let me first talk about the similarities: (1) both can be deliciously pleasurable; (2) the sex of the person you do it with doesn't matter; (3) creativity and innovation is very much appreciated, or as I always say, monotony is codswallop. 

Now, the differences. To simplify: not all making love is fucking and not all fucking is making love. 

I guess making love is something based on tenderness and love and all that fluffy stuff and rainbows and gummy bears.  You know, things dreams are made of. If it means you get slammed to the wall, handcuffed, and positioned awkwardly - fine. If love (and consent) is there, that is love making. 

Fucking is just a joining of two bodies for the sake of pleasure or one or of both or of all partners. 

Regardless of whether it's making love or fucking, please, for the love of decency and justice, don't do the wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am routine. And don't forget the condom. It prevents complications like unwanted pregnancies, and like one of my AIDS course prof said, "having sex in a sea of virologic ignorance".


Segue: Above is a shot film called "Just Once", which is part of a series of short films from Scenarios in Africa, an NGO that creates short films about HIV/AIDS. Coolies right? Check 'em out. =)

Q: (Buddy Question) To what extent can you give your love to a person who doesn't love you?


A: Woah, that's tough. Parang IELTS lang ha! I guess you love that person in the “I want him/her to be happy” sort of way. You love that person to the extent that you hope to be THE ONE, but that won’t matter as long as he/she finds THE ONE, or as long as he/she is happy. In other words, you love him/her in a quiet way, like most love stories go. Save some for yourself, though. Their happiness doesn't mean you have to be miserable.


Q: (Buddy Question) Does sexual pleasure equate to how much people love one another?

A: Yes and no. I would say it's more pleasurable to have sex with someone you love. But to be blunt, love is not equal to performance, and performance is pretty damn important. So learn the moves and learn them well boys and girls. It's practically a duty.

And speaking of love and sex, did you know that the use of contraceptive methods can increase the pleasure you get from the act? It's because both partners would feel secure that there won't be any unplanned babies and they'd have some security from STIs. Click on this for one of my favorite easy-breezy sites for your birth control guides and know-hows. 

Now repeat after me: 


Q: Would you want a fairy tale love story?

A: If the fairy tale means that I get to be a ninja and fight the bad guys with my "prince", then yes, I'd like a fairy tale love story. I mean, why be a princess when you can be a ninja?



Q: I'm broken. My heart lays in cold, shattered pieces. Can I ever love again?

A: You know, broken glass can be melted and molded into something new. To simplify: you're broken, not dead. 



Q: Do you believe in happy endings?

A: Why yes, I do. 


Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Anyare?!

So the Supreme Court issued a status quo ante, stopping the implementation of the RH law, apparently to hear out those who filed petitions against it.  The RH Law is being suspended for 120 days or 4 months. Those who voted for this controversial move are Presbitero Velasco Jr., Teresita de Castro, Arturo Brion, Diosdado Peralta, Lucas Bersamin, Roberto Abad, Martin Villarama Jr., Jose Perez, Jose Mendoza, and Bienvenido Reyes. Going against them were Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno, Antonio Carpio, Estela Perlas-Bernabe, Mariano Del Castillo, and Marvic Leonen. It was a 10-5 battle, and we're obviously in the losing end. Remember their names, my friends. Remember their names.

After 14 years of blood, sweat, and tears, of battles in the cyberworld, in congress, and in the streets, this happens. After the bill was torn apart and put together in both Upper and Lower House for more than a decade and after the finally President signed it, they take it back. After the IRR has been written with all the consideration for people's religious feelings despite sacrificing so many good provisions, they stop a law that is built to better people's lives dead on its tracks. 

Wow. 

Good job, Anti-RH peeps. You guys are probably celebrating in your self-righteous, sinless ways, which of course excludes alcohol and hot make-out sessions. Way to go. Excellent job. Great work. We're 14 years delayed already, what's four more months? It'll only mean the death of 1,320 mothers because of pregnancy-related complications that might otherwise be prevented or solved if the LAW had been implemented as it should be. It'll only mean more cases of teenage pregnancies because the youth have very little access to reproductive health. It'll only mean the continuous rise of HIV infections. 

In a statement by RH advocate Edcel Lagman, he explains the constitutionality of the RH Law.


Time to put on my Vagina Warrior armor again. They say it will take four months to sort out the petitions, and out champions are optimistic of the outcome. We advocates can wait this out. But we won't wait quietly. We will watch and speak and act just like we have watched and spoken and acted to make comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services a reality. 

We don't take injustice sitting down. 

Your move, Supreme Court. 



Monday, March 18, 2013

Selfishness, RH IRR, and Adios Damaso!

I was told that I should be selfish and think of myself, as advocacy will still be there when I am more established and probably in a much better position to help people. This is the same person who taught me that discrimination isn't 100% bad. Thank you for thinking that this isn't just a phase and I'll 'grow out of it'. Sadly, some people think that - think that I am a frivolous little girl with frivolous desires. I promise to focus on bettering my career, but like I said, I am in love with advocacy. I'll manage it, somehow.

Although I am already very selfish, I am sharing this poem. It's not financial stability and career improvement, but it is all mine... or should I say all me?

Their secrets and her secrets, she whispers to the sky.
Her secrets are wishes
written upon clouds and upon paper,
neither fulfilled nor heard
by gods or by fate.
Meaningless against indifference,
perishing in insignificance.

…for perhaps there is no god,
and perhaps there is no fate,
to blame for the fragments of her heart -
only unquenchable desire
for the untouchable stars.

(3 March 2013, 2:13AM)

Now back to regular programming. 


I was fortunate to be at Implementing Rules and Regulations Consultation for the Reproductive Health Law last March 9 at the Century Park Hotel, along with other members of the Alliance of Young Nurse Leaders and Advocates and Philippine Health Bloggers Society. I saw a few familiar faces such as fellow nurse and AIDS prevention advocate Angelo Esperanzate (with his cool, top of the line camera), Red Tani and his gang from the Filipino Freethinkers, my ultimate girl crush Ana Santos of Sex and Sensibilities, and Ms. Beth Angsioco of DSWP.

The IRR was signed, sealed, and is ready for implementation on Easter Sunday, and that makes me one incredibly happy chick. Despite this, there is one parts of the IRR (and the law, for that matter) that is like a cloud in a clear blue summer sky. 

In Chapter 2 of the IRR presented for the consultation, a section is devoted to the access of minors to family planning services:

This part is okay; it's what the RH Law is all about, after all:
  • No person shall be denied information and access to family planning services, whether natural or artificial
This part got many people scratching their heads: 
  • A minor will only be allowed access to FP services in public health facilities if he/she
         1. Presents written consent from their parents and/or legal guardians; or
  


       2. Has had a previous pregnancy as proven by documentation that includes, but is not  limited to:
              ~ Written documentation from a physician;
              ~ Documentation through ancillary examinations such as ultrasound;
              ~ Written documentation submitted by guardian

So it is either the girl's already a teenage mom (which is what we're trying to prevent in the first place) OR it's "Hey Mom, I'm 15, I think I'm in love with this boy, and I wanna have sex. Can you give me a written consent so I can get some rubber from the health center nurse?" 

Good luck with THAT happening. 

Unfortunately, the IRR team can't really change what is in the law, and this particular mind-numbing restriction IS in the law. Fortunately, the IRR team is a wais lot. This little problem could be solved by exploiting loopholes, and explore loopholes they did. IRR Drafting Team member Nr. Alvin Dakis enumerates some of the changes here.:

  • One parent providing consent is acceptable. This is to recognize single parents.
  • Social Workers can give consent for street children.
  • An older brother or sister can give consent, provided that they are above 18.
Of course, since the restriction is for public facilities only, minors can still get appropriate help with birth control through private providers and non-government organizations like Likhaan. Check them out.: http://www.likhaan.org. Or you can phone them at 926-6230.

Here's another shiny new feature of the signed IRR:

That in case a minor satisfies any of the above conditions but is still refuse access to information and/or services, the minor may direct complaints to the designated Reproductive Health Officer (RHO) of the facility. Complaints shall be acted upon immediately.

The law may be restrictive to providing RH information and services to minors, but there are still loopholes to be exploited. And exploit we shall.

Check out the full IRR here.

What brought about this mother of contradictions? The RH Law was crafted not only to better maternal mortality and morbidity, but also to curb the staggering numbers of teenage pregnancy. The Philippines is practically teenage pregnancy capital of Asia, and one of the ways that is seen to be effective solution to the problem is providing FP and RH information and services to the youth


That kamot-ulo restriction had kamot-ulo origins. Why was this allowed in the RHRP Law? Two things: bargain buy and Sotto Conservatism.

In order for the other legislators to buy the RH Bill, some changes had to be made in its less conservative provisions. The universal access to services apparently suffered along with many other important provisions. "Of course minors should not know how to put on a condom! Why, they might actually USE it! And knowing about sex might make them eager for premarital sex! Even if studies show that it's the opposite, well, I don't believe it!" We're talking about reproductive and sexual health education here, not porn. It's kind of sad that minors have to turn to porn to learn about sex. I mean, it's great for techniques and positions, but it doesn't really say a lot about safe sex. This way of thinking is one of the products of idiot conservatism that the RH Law had to fight through - ultra-conservative and hypocrite society, politicians, and the Catholic Bishop's Conference of the Philippines whose vendetta against those who passed and lobbied for comprehensive sexual and reproductive health has been preposterous at worst, atrocious at best. 


The Diocese of Bacolod's infamous Team Buhay/Team Patay oversized tarp.








Above is the latest name the CBCP has for RH supporters: Team Patay. In fairness, it is a tad better than the Saved Sex tarp that cropped up with a few months ago. Despite the obvious improvement of wordplay, I still think that the move is far from cute. After denying time and again that they are politicking - well, they are politicking. Bashing people on the pulpit; branding those who go against them as the anti-life and family wreckers; endorsing candidates who are anti-RH and calling them Team Buhay even if their only merit is to go against the RH Bill and having pamatay less-than-squeeky-clean records. Threatening candidates who've ignored their irrational pleas with the mythological Catholic Vote. Plain -as-daylight politicking.


The COMELEC has asked the Diocese to take down the tarp, and the Diocese cried fowl and invoked Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion. Ironic that they should be citing the same right that should have allowed Carlos Celdran to go free for his Damaso act in the Manila Cathedral. Way to invoke the law when it suits you. 

We all know the story. RH champion Carlos Celdran showed up in the Manila Cathedral and told the Bishops to keep their noses and rosaries out of politics. That little stunt got him sued. So much for Freedom of Speech.

The truth: I am tired of these  men, the so-called Princes of the Church, throwing self-righteous codswallop about morality when they mollycoddle their rapists and pedophile ka-baro and criminals who supply them with Pajero, turn a blind eye to discrimination because they are a major force behind it, and believe themselves above others and above the law. The RCC invokes the power of the majority, believing its followers will follow without thinking, believing that its decision is the best decision, regardless of how it marginalizes those who they believe to be below their moral standards. These old men preach righteousness, when they have barely have any.

I am, in short, tired of bullshit. So tired, in fact, that I was wonderfully relieved that Tagle was not made Pope. I did know know how I'll be able to stand CBCP's rabid fanboying if that happened. 


There you go, ladies and gents: the reason why I've left. I'm not good with terms, so I don't know what to call myself as of now. But labels are just labels, after all, like "Princes of the Church" and "Team Patay."

Should I be questioned on my religious beliefs, well, here is my answer.:
Do I believe in God? Does that even matter? I believe that no one is above others. I believe in people's ability to love truly and to give, to be kind and to be merciful of others. I believe that even without religion a person can be good. 


Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Debunking Duesberg Hypothesis


A/N: Below is my first essay for the online course on AIDS that I am taking. It is my attempt to squeeze in the everything in my head in only 600 words. I am sharing this with you because, although not the best, I am proud of it. This one is dedicated to the friends who inspire me to pursue bigger and better things. Don't worry. I promise to do better on my next essay.

Photo from worlddomination.com


Among the many AIDS denialist theories, molecular biology professor Peter Duesberg’s is possibly the most popular, if not the most controversial. In 1998 study, Duesberg zeroed in on drug use and anti-retroviral drug therapy as the catalysts of AIDS. He showed that majority of those with AIDS in the United States and Europe were recreational drug users. Another similarity was the use anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs).[i] Of course, other men and women of science did not take these propositions sitting down. On Duesberg’s website is a quote from a great scientist, Albert Einstein: “The important thing is to never stop questioning.” Those who were unconvinced by the Duesberg Hypothesis did just that.

In his study, Duesberg pointed out that in the early 1980s, those who were diagnosed with AIDS were also mostly homosexual men with multiple sex partners, and who used recreational drugs as aphrodisiac or psychoactive stimulants, some of which introduced to the body intravenously. This was one of the reasons why he pointed to drugs as a cause of AIDS.i Closely associated with the onset of AIDS is the decline in the CD4 cells, which are damaged when the virus replicates. This drop is an important basis in diagnosing if a person has developed AIDS. The study Does Drug Cause AIDS?, published in Nature in 1993, showed that the CD4 count of those who were seronegative or HIV-negative individuals regardless of drug use had relatively stable CD4 count. Furthermore, this entire group’s CD4 level stayed well above the normal value (600-1,200 cells per cubic millimiter[ii]) from 1986 to 1990. In contrast, regardless of drug use, CD4 cell count of those who were seropositive (positive for HIV) declined significantly. It is interesting to note that the 
discrepancies in the CD4 decline of those subgroups with varying drug use were only very slight.[iii] As the seronegative drug users do not experience a collapse in their immune system, these statistics strongly suggest that drug use does not affect the progression of the infection. This conclusion was further strengthened by a study entitled Recreational Drug Use and T Lymphocyte Subpopulations in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected Men, published in 2008, which looked at the correlation of CD4 and CD8 count with drug use in men who have sex with men (MSM). Here researchers found no clinically meaningful associations between use of marijuana, cocaine, poppers, or amphetamines and CD4 and CD8 T cell counts, percentages, or rates of change in either HIV-uninfected or -infected men.”[iv]  These studies are very strong evidence against the Duesberg Hypothesis.

Another controversial clause in the denialist’s claims is that anti-retroviral drugs are the actual cause of AIDS. Antiretroviral drugs act to inhibit viral replication, preventing the increase in concentration of HIV in the system. It was observed in a study conducted by Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University of Zurich, in 1999 that 6.6% out of 2,675 HIV patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) achieved and maintained undetectable viral loads. Viral load is, of course, correlated with the progression of disease.  Several studies also correlated ARV use to significantly slowing down the progression of the disease. In the clinical trial called BW002, Azidothymidine  efficacy was compared with placebo in 282 patients with  AIDS or late signs of HIV infection. In the trial, only one of the 145 patients treated with the drug died whereas 19 out of 137 patients treated with placebo died within six months.[v]

Properly questioned and dissected, it seems that the Duesberg hypothesis cannot to stand the test of science.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

More Than the Character, the Issue



Roughly a week after digital uprising catalyzed by Cynthia Villar’s controversial TV interview where she inadvertently made use of the term “Room Nurses”, the senatoriable sat down with the officers and members of the Philippine Health Bloggers Society.

This is her side of the story, albeit not verbatim.:

The question Winnie Monsod gave was regarding the closing down of nursing schools roughly 5 years ago. Mrs. Villar stated that she acted to intercede between CHED and the Nursing schools that are foreclosure out of concern for the students who would be displace should these learning facilities be really closed. Her answer was rooted on her business sense – that what you invest on should have some form of profit. In this case, the senatoriable believes that those who may not be able to continue their education because their schools will be closed down should still have opportunities for employment. She believed that those who may be displaced should these schools be closed may still be “room nurses”. In this context, she was not talking about BSN graduates or Registered Nurses, but undergrads. Thus, her use of the words, “hindi naman gaanong kagalingan”. She said that a person who has received a BSN has better competencies than undergraduates, but that these “room nurses” can still earn a living. The term “room nurse” was not an insult, but a statement of a fact.

From left to right: Yours truly, with PHBS Chairman Nr. Alvin Dakis,
meeting with Mrs. Cynthia Villar


Before you guys run after me with pitchforks and burn me like Inquisition-crazed Catholics of the Dark Ages, I just want to clarify - this is a report of what occurred during the meeting and not in any way a defense for Mrs. Villar. Should you find her explanation acceptable or not is up to you.

Of Questions


These events have led to a massive wave of reaction in social networking sites. Statuses, memes, and tweets showed the fury of hundreds of nurses here and abroad. Many proclaimed that they will not vote for her in the coming elections, and many invoked the power of potassium chloride to permanently shut the senatoriable up.

I have a simple principle: You may call a spade a space, and thus refer to a person as an idiot should said person be a legit idiot. Let us admit it. It was a bad move for the senatoriable. Or bad editing on the part of the TV station. Overall, it leaves a nasty taste in the mouth. 

But what good does it do, really? Sure, the pictures are funny, the name-calling’s hilarious, the Senora Santibanez memes are unforgettable, but do they solve issues?

The question of what Mrs. Villar can do to pacify our collectively (butt)hurt pride as professionals is not THE question, or if it is, it pales in comparison to what is really important. THE question is what WE can do to ensure that our profession will never be at the business end of insults, intended or otherwise, ever again.

I mean, if Mrs. Villar were to go down on her knees, beg for forgiveness (she did already, sans the kneeling), take up BS Nursing like she tweeted, and donate money to nurses, would it solve our problem?

I think we know the answer to that.

Let me just say, “Dude, it’s your Facebook account, and Cybercrime is on TRO. You can do whatever the hell you like.” But if we seriously divert this much energy to trying to solve our real problems, we’d probably be a lot closer to the solution than we are today.

These are the stuff we should really be concerned with:

Question: Why did nurses react so violently to Mrs. Villar’s proclamations? I mean seriously, KCl injections are like the epitome of violence.

Answer: Because we’re tired of our profession being looked down on.

Question: WHY is the nursing profession being looked down on?

Answer: Several reasons: because nurses have been stereotyped as doctor’s assistance since the beginning of time; because in the Philippines, if you’re a hospital nurse and you’re earning PHP8,000 per month, you’d be so thankful you’d kiss any imaginary god’s feet; because we are unemployed, underemployed, employed in jobs that we’re not even supposed to do, and there was a time we needed to pay and kiss arse to even be considered as volunteers; because we have been stereotyped as an unpatriotic selfish bunch that would give an arm and a leg just to get out of this self-proclaimed godforsaken country and go to better places, preferably with white-skinned citizens; because the quality of nurses we are producing is dropping at an alarming rate, as shown by the decline of Nursing Licensure Exam passers; because people don’t seem to see just how important a nurse is in the health care system – that Philippine health care would perish without us. Lots and lots of factors, really.

Question: What do WE do about these reasons then? That’s right, not the government. WE.

FUNNY! And the Hello Kitty Cap is cute.
 How does this solve unemployment again?

Your move, Nurse. 




Janina Santos is the Founding President of the Philippine Health Bloggers Society. She is also Secretary of Publications and Media Relations and Corporate Treasurer of the Alliance of Young Nurse Leaders and Advocates International, Inc. However, this is her personal blog and does not, in any way, reflect the official statement of the organizations regarding this issue.